When it comes to measurement regarding romantic envy, from the forty thinking-declaration devices was basically reported while the creation of new Care about-Statement and you may Projective Jealousy Scales ( Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979 ). Of numerous products were utilized only when. , 1992 ) created to evaluate gender distinctions; the latest Multidimensional Envy Size ( Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989 ) built to measure the around three size of envy (cognitive, psychological and you will behavioral size); the fresh Fb Jealousy Scale ( Muise, Christofides, & De l’ensemble des ) geared towards comparing the probability of an event that creates ideas out of envy users linked to their hobby into the Fb; this new Envy Scale ( Buunk, 1997 ), familiar with check about three form of jealousy (activated, stressed and you can visite site precautionary) together with Interpersonal Jealousy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981 ), and this assesses new bad feelings through actual or threatened loss out of a loved individual a competitor. All of the tool listed above have demostrated adequate amounts of legitimacy and you can reliability.
Mathes and Severa (1981) establish a couple knowledge, and basic study performed the building of measure having 39 circumstances, that was shorter so you’re able to 28 things shortly after mathematical studies
In the Mexico, good Multidimensional Way of measuring Envy ( Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989 ) has been elaborated and you can a preliminary studies are through with the fresh Multidimensional Index out-of Personal Envy ( Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016 ). In Brazil, the brand new Personal Envy List try modified ( Bueno & Carvalho, 2012 ) As for Colombia, there are no psychometric training out-of a specific level on the close jealousy. Likewise, earlier in the day degree don’t perform Factorial Confirmatory Data (CFA) to validate the newest foundation build discover, and reduced accuracy profile was included in the circumstances (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or quick products were utilized (Mota et al., 2016).
Regarding the Latin american context, there is an adaptation during the Chile of the List out-of Behaviors of Couple That can cause Envy ( Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014 )
This new IJS create to own Mathes and you will Severa (1981) the most made use of balances for evaluating intimate jealousy, they located six facts you to assess the sensitiveness so you can dangers relevant to: (a) Lover’s unfaithfulness and matchmaking others (points step 1, 3, a dozen, 14, 15, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you can 25); (b) Lover’s dominance (products dos, 3, cuatro, eight, 10, thirteen, 17, 20, and you may 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy partner (situations 1, cuatro, 6, 19, and you can 21); (d) Lover’s old dates (situations 11, 24, 26, twenty seven, and you can twenty eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (circumstances 8, 9 and 24); and you will (f) Partner’s kept friends having old dates and you can sex distinctions (situations 5 and you may 18).
You will find five training that have examined in terms of the reliability and you will validity. Next, in the one minute data, IJS was applied alongside almost every other bills one analyzed intimate like-backlinks, low self-esteem, self-admiration and you may an ad hoc questionnaire off independent identities, verifying, centered on concept, that the expert out of envy, the better the degree of Intimate love and the minimal the new separate term of your few. In this study, i declaration a good coefficient out of precision off .92 for the overall level. When you look at the a third investigation, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you will Penis (1982) , so you’re able to expand the indicators regarding validity, utilized the IJS as well as 2 behavioural steps: (a) risk whenever met with a rival and you may (b) terms off possessiveness into the spouse, by way of a telephone call that they made to the person who took part in the research. This new expected correlations was indeed obtained, and that once more offered brand new validity of your own scale. Ultimately, inside the a fourth investigation, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) substantiated brand new convergent authenticity regarding IJS with other scales one examined intimate jealousy.
